|
Paying for representation....
06/10/2008 12:39:15 / don't know
I would like to ask your opinion.
There is a gallery in New York that I submitted my work to about a month ago and they said they would like to represent my paintings. Of course hearing those words for most (not necessarily all) artists would be music to their ears. I read through the agreement and come to find this gallery is a little different to others. You actually PAY for that representation. It's very well put together and there are different levels of costs ranging from $3k to well... over $20k and that doesn't include any pricing of course with getting it framed or getting it to... or from the gallery should it not sell.
This past weekend I drove up to New York to see the gallery and meet the curator. 1500 mile trip. EXHAUSTING to say the least. The gallery was in a good area in Chelsea and the curator was extremely professional and courteous. They really do have their act together, online, through print and in the actual gallery, but that 'act' comes at a price. I'm looking at having to shell out $5k for this representation, although if/when paintings sell they take 30% not 50%.
So why am I tell 'you' all this? Well. I want to know what you think. Have you heard or this before? If this common practice that I don't know about?
I don't have an 'art history' with galleries, although we all have to start somewhere... do we not? The only way people would 'know' me or my paintings would be from an one line perspective. This really was one of the first galleries I submitted my art to to be honest.
Five grand for my paintings to meet the world...or New York at least! hmmmm. I sure could buy a lot of canvas and materials with five grand.
So.. What do you think?
|
|
|
MEMBERS COMMENTS
|
|
VIEWING 1 - 6 OUT OF 6 COMMENTS
|
|
|
|